February 1, 2014
My Rebuttal to Anita Busch’s” Violence in Movies” Article on Deadline

Here is the link to the original article for those curious. 

Yet again ,we see Harvey Weinstein trying to sound like a moral guardian to the rest of the United States . Much of his comments on “hating violence” in movies or gun violence ring hollow when:

-The Weinstein Company, on a yearly basis, make films that not only glorify gun violence, but also make light of the issue. Many films have been made under the distribution and authority of Harvey Weinstein such as Kill Bill that are well-known for its stylization of said violence. 

Read More

December 1, 2013
Why Parenting in the 21st Century Matters

Because the family unit and personal responsibility for the next generation has been eroded by wanting to appease their immediate rather than long term needs. But that has been happening since after the second World War. Parents wonder why children are socially awkward, act self entitled , or go around engaging in thuggery like in the knockout “game”, but many have themselves to blame. They will blame everything from metal, rock and roll, to video games to TV , movies or even groups of people for why the youth are so broken today.

How can parents call the youth out for being irresponsible and not having direction when their parents and the people of their parents’ generation were not accountable or responsible when it came to their own children?

People would rather buy a few trinkets to ignore the cold truth of their own making or pretend it does not exist than take the responsibility to impart into their children what reality is. If parents are placing their children into a bubble and treating them like inconveniences to be drugged or appeased, they should not be parents period. Just because someone has the capability to reproduce does not mean they should if they cannot be accountable or responsible for their children’s wellbeing.

Read More

October 29, 2013

2spookyvendetta:

lunavapour:

shakespearelove:

melly-saurus:

halalmarshmallows:

eelifp:

thesomerley:

faithfulsurrender:

1st image: Christians in Egypt forming a barrier to protect Muslims while they pray (2011) 
2nd image: Muslims in Egypt forming a barrier to protect a church from being destroyed (2013) 

Forever rebloging.

Humanity: You’re doing it right.

THIS  is what Religion is supposed to be, Take your bigotry elsewhere.

I’ve said it before.
I’ll say it again.
THIS. Is what HUMANITY is supposed to be.

I find this so beautiful. Religion is always portrayed as ‘either one or the other’ or ‘its us against them’. This picture amazingly shows acceptance. It shouldn’t matter what God you turn to or if you don’t have one at all, believe in what you want to make you happy and get through each day as it comes.

FUCKIN YESSSSSS

This is love. Period. 

(via missinterpretations)

October 29, 2013
quickhits:

TX anti-abortion law ruled unconstitutional.
Republicans are big defenders of the constitution — until they’re not.
Republicans don’t want Big Government between you and your doctor — until they do.
Republicans are against burdensome regulations on business — until they aren’t.
Republicans love liberty — until they don’t.

I could care less about party lines and neither should you. However, lets acknowledge reality. 
Democrats instituted the KKK, Jim Crow , promote racist unions and the onset of big government, all against constitutional principles. Many of their presidents supported slavery and oppressing minorities, while Republicans supported minorities when it wasn’t trendy. Now we see leftists play dress up and act like Civil Rights champions, when they impoverish and create a distinctly racial class system where people of color are oppressed not unlike in the hellhole on the Indian Subcontinent where women are raped and treated as objects. Why should we trust a wholly unconstitutional and antiscientific ruling which is based in a culture of death from a party that revels in it? Some Republicans should also get that memo such as McCain who trample on it and act like it is useless, and frankly this is why I can’t consider myself either party anymore. 
Republicans on the other hand basically collapsed a democratic Persia and created a fascist society that Obama did not seem to right the wrong during the Green Revolution, created and funded there very terrorists we are dealing with today just because they wanted to play politics in the Middle East against Russia. Didn’t go well for Vietnam or for Korea or China or Germany, so why would it succeed there? All that happened was give the weapons to the crazies to which we are left to deal with today. However, both sides contributed to this as neither stemmed or made up for those damages, and were clearly wrong. 
I don’t believe in abortions , however if someone gets an abortion for any reason , it is equivalent to murder when similar cases when a man killed a pregnant mother landed him with two sentences of murder. Either the baby is worth nothing in both cases or otherwise it is. Also, why are we men deciding what is best for a woman to do with her body when the majority of the government is ran by men? Or for an unborn child? Why do we seek to murder children and justify it as they aren’t worth anything and cannot feel  or sense? Since those children will never have a word for them, isn’t that tantamount to slavery itself like Obamacare? We were all babies, but do you wish death on yourself or others because of that fact? If a child was born with a disability, or if it cannot sense a thing, does that mean we should kill that child? That’s a deprivation of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness right here. 
Regulations over human behavior are relatively useless as people will do them anyways and for the wrong reasons such as for being cool or rebelling. Banning drinking leads to Al Capone, drugs to the immigration issues down South, banning books leads to stagnation, or criminalizing piracy and or legitimate back-ups of privately owned products leads to it becoming cool. Banning homosexuality ,polygamy or interracial relations leads to societal insecurities and unrest over a relatively natural behavior. There is a reason why people think drinking while driving is cool when its made into an act of rebellion, like many other negative behaviors. 
Clearly banning things won’t do anything, but to act like killing a person is right under any circumstance is quite another.  
Here’s this splendid thing about Republicans: we are diverse.  You can be a liberal to the most ardent anarchist , and you can believe in Apollo, the tree in your backyard to Shiva to Buddha or to Allah or to God and Yahweh. You can even be LGBT and or a person of color.  By your logic, I don’t see that much diversity within the Democrat Party where their representative all think the same,act the same and do everything the same way. And by that same logic, despite us fighting against each other at points, we stand together even stronger because we do not seem like robots. I know Democrats that are arguably as diverse as Republicans, so let us not go down this road,no?

Democrats laud regulations when the free market would have weeded the losers out, such as in the meat packing industry or even in health care or other industries. They only like the free market when it makes their Marxist wallets fat, much like the fat cats Karl Marx and his partner. They tout regulations as necessary, but then the very history of government’s involvement into the private sector has been of corruption and failure.
Democrats are for science until it is inconvenient against their politics. Just look at abortion and global warming. Oh and Al Gore is an oil pusher and hack, and fracking/Keystone will make us economically independent from terroristic regimes that want everyone who does not think like them dead. Draining our food supply is mentally impotent and acting like we can control nature is pathetic arrogance and very narcissistic. Science has said that human life starts are conception for centuries while common sense said far earlier. Babies who are killed at conception are ripped like trash and thrown away as such. Doesn’t mean the Pro-Life angle is better either at times, but I disagree that it is constitutional to bereave a child of life, which is one of the central tenets of the Constitution. 
Democrats laud big business until it touts their political line. Just look at Hollywood and the mainstream media. Without big business or capitalism, many wouldn’t last in the real world. Madoff, Soros, and various other rich frauds that like corruption are Democrat. If a Marxist really wants to cut all ties from capitalism, do so and give up all of your possessions, go broke and try to make anything of note without capitalism. Other you sound like an entitled spoiled brat that wants what others have earned. Go get a job and live in the real world and learn how real people live outside of your bubble. 
Russell Brand hates profits, so why does he live in luxury while his fellow British live in slums and have to endure a horrible socialistic health system. However, why are we not entitled to the rich socialists’ entire funds and life?They hate their money, so give it up. At least Conservative Republicans and Libertarians would do far better with it than demagogue and whine like a bunch of bitches. 
Democrats are for LGBT, people of color and those with disabilities until they have different opposing viewpoints. Then they send death threats, bully them and other acts of hate that is bereft of civility. They love coddling and victimizing minorities and the poor so they can never grow up and join the rest of the sane world but instead be childish redneck-barbarians and troglodytes with no worth whatsoever to society. For those who have seen the error of this system and speak about it , they are demonized and insulted.Aren’t we supposed to be for liberty? Many Planned Parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods and most abortions are from them. Margaret Sanger was a notorious Social Darwinist and racist that her policies were duplicated by Adolf Hitler in the Holocaust. 
You only love liberty when we are on a leash and can say nothing while you shout at us and defame us. You condemn the veterans, condemn Bush [which wasn’t that bad of a president anyways] and condemn your own Americans either below the Dixie Line or otherwise. If you were truly fro liberty, you would protect others regardless of their opposing views , but you don’t because that would mean you would have to go against your party line. 
So let’s not tow the party line, shall we?

quickhits:

TX anti-abortion law ruled unconstitutional.

Republicans are big defenders of the constitution — until they’re not.

Republicans don’t want Big Government between you and your doctor — until they do.

Republicans are against burdensome regulations on business — until they aren’t.

Republicans love liberty — until they don’t.

I could care less about party lines and neither should you. However, lets acknowledge reality. 

Democrats instituted the KKK, Jim Crow , promote racist unions and the onset of big government, all against constitutional principles. Many of their presidents supported slavery and oppressing minorities, while Republicans supported minorities when it wasn’t trendy. Now we see leftists play dress up and act like Civil Rights champions, when they impoverish and create a distinctly racial class system where people of color are oppressed not unlike in the hellhole on the Indian Subcontinent where women are raped and treated as objects. Why should we trust a wholly unconstitutional and antiscientific ruling which is based in a culture of death from a party that revels in it? Some Republicans should also get that memo such as McCain who trample on it and act like it is useless, and frankly this is why I can’t consider myself either party anymore. 

Republicans on the other hand basically collapsed a democratic Persia and created a fascist society that Obama did not seem to right the wrong during the Green Revolution, created and funded there very terrorists we are dealing with today just because they wanted to play politics in the Middle East against Russia. Didn’t go well for Vietnam or for Korea or China or Germany, so why would it succeed there? All that happened was give the weapons to the crazies to which we are left to deal with today. However, both sides contributed to this as neither stemmed or made up for those damages, and were clearly wrong. 

I don’t believe in abortions , however if someone gets an abortion for any reason , it is equivalent to murder when similar cases when a man killed a pregnant mother landed him with two sentences of murder. Either the baby is worth nothing in both cases or otherwise it is. Also, why are we men deciding what is best for a woman to do with her body when the majority of the government is ran by men? Or for an unborn child? Why do we seek to murder children and justify it as they aren’t worth anything and cannot feel  or sense? Since those children will never have a word for them, isn’t that tantamount to slavery itself like Obamacare? We were all babies, but do you wish death on yourself or others because of that fact? If a child was born with a disability, or if it cannot sense a thing, does that mean we should kill that child? That’s a deprivation of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness right here. 

Regulations over human behavior are relatively useless as people will do them anyways and for the wrong reasons such as for being cool or rebelling. Banning drinking leads to Al Capone, drugs to the immigration issues down South, banning books leads to stagnation, or criminalizing piracy and or legitimate back-ups of privately owned products leads to it becoming cool. Banning homosexuality ,polygamy or interracial relations leads to societal insecurities and unrest over a relatively natural behavior. There is a reason why people think drinking while driving is cool when its made into an act of rebellion, like many other negative behaviors. 

Clearly banning things won’t do anything, but to act like killing a person is right under any circumstance is quite another.  

Here’s this splendid thing about Republicans: we are diverse.  You can be a liberal to the most ardent anarchist , and you can believe in Apollo, the tree in your backyard to Shiva to Buddha or to Allah or to God and Yahweh. You can even be LGBT and or a person of color.  By your logic, I don’t see that much diversity within the Democrat Party where their representative all think the same,act the same and do everything the same way. And by that same logic, despite us fighting against each other at points, we stand together even stronger because we do not seem like robots. I know Democrats that are arguably as diverse as Republicans, so let us not go down this road,no?

Democrats laud regulations when the free market would have weeded the losers out, such as in the meat packing industry or even in health care or other industries. They only like the free market when it makes their Marxist wallets fat, much like the fat cats Karl Marx and his partner. They tout regulations as necessary, but then the very history of government’s involvement into the private sector has been of corruption and failure.

Democrats are for science until it is inconvenient against their politics. Just look at abortion and global warming. Oh and Al Gore is an oil pusher and hack, and fracking/Keystone will make us economically independent from terroristic regimes that want everyone who does not think like them dead. Draining our food supply is mentally impotent and acting like we can control nature is pathetic arrogance and very narcissistic. Science has said that human life starts are conception for centuries while common sense said far earlier. Babies who are killed at conception are ripped like trash and thrown away as such. Doesn’t mean the Pro-Life angle is better either at times, but I disagree that it is constitutional to bereave a child of life, which is one of the central tenets of the Constitution. 

Democrats laud big business until it touts their political line. Just look at Hollywood and the mainstream media. Without big business or capitalism, many wouldn’t last in the real world. Madoff, Soros, and various other rich frauds that like corruption are Democrat. If a Marxist really wants to cut all ties from capitalism, do so and give up all of your possessions, go broke and try to make anything of note without capitalism. Other you sound like an entitled spoiled brat that wants what others have earned. Go get a job and live in the real world and learn how real people live outside of your bubble. 

Russell Brand hates profits, so why does he live in luxury while his fellow British live in slums and have to endure a horrible socialistic health system. However, why are we not entitled to the rich socialists’ entire funds and life?They hate their money, so give it up. At least Conservative Republicans and Libertarians would do far better with it than demagogue and whine like a bunch of bitches. 

Democrats are for LGBT, people of color and those with disabilities until they have different opposing viewpoints. Then they send death threats, bully them and other acts of hate that is bereft of civility. They love coddling and victimizing minorities and the poor so they can never grow up and join the rest of the sane world but instead be childish redneck-barbarians and troglodytes with no worth whatsoever to society. For those who have seen the error of this system and speak about it , they are demonized and insulted.Aren’t we supposed to be for liberty? Many Planned Parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods and most abortions are from them. Margaret Sanger was a notorious Social Darwinist and racist that her policies were duplicated by Adolf Hitler in the Holocaust. 

You only love liberty when we are on a leash and can say nothing while you shout at us and defame us. You condemn the veterans, condemn Bush [which wasn’t that bad of a president anyways] and condemn your own Americans either below the Dixie Line or otherwise. If you were truly fro liberty, you would protect others regardless of their opposing views , but you don’t because that would mean you would have to go against your party line. 

So let’s not tow the party line, shall we?

(via missinterpretations)

October 29, 2013
Let me make this clear.

simplymoono:

new-age-conservative:

They are Halloween costumes. If you are offended by them, you’re probably an idiot.

Right

http://ionenewsone.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/trayvon-costume.jpg?w=700&h=700

Just

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1492636.1382461243!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/african23n-5-web.jpg

Costumes

http://fashionbombdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hallowood-2013-party-giampaolo-sgura-photo-zhanna-romashka-DSCF6989-1.jpg

As if I didn’t have a big enough headache to begin with…

Worrying over a holiday versus how Obamacare and other far more important policies will ruin your life? Classic. 

They’re just stupid , but some lib stars have done it, so what is the big deal? There was a time that if you wore certain clothes, you could get burned for it.  You likely voted for Obama, who helped destabilize the entire Middle East even further, continued policies from that hated Bush , or his continuous blunder with foreign policy and other blunders. 

First was Fast and Furious, where American and Mexicans were killed by guns given from Eric Holder. 

Second was his drone strikes on not only terrorists, but people unrelated or even American citizens not given a trial.

Third was Benghazi. 4 Americans died and we lost Libya’s respect there. 

Fourth was Egypt. We eliminated a sorta bad dictator that did not do bad to his people but then inserted a Hitler in his place via Morsi. His regime killed multiple Christians and persecuted many women, free thinkers and Muslims against Sharia law. 

Fifth was Snowden. He took valuable leaked info and ran off with it to Russia, and Obama did nothing. 

Sixth was Syria. If we went by your logic, weapons in Syria from Iraq shouldn’t exist because wait a minute, the MSM said that there were no weapons of mass destruction. Now we saw them used by both the terrorist side that Obama and the war hawks supported, and some parts of Assad’s regime. Why meddle in the affairs of Syria is Obama didn’t care about the atrocities two years ago over weapons that do not exist? 

The seventh and so on are of his various trips in insulting Catholics all over the world in Ireland, Christians in Kenya over homosexuality [yet he supports homophobes in the Muslim world who literally kill LGBTs, go figure] , dusting off the beginning genocide and persecution of Christians all across the Middle East. 

The final ones are how he defames those in the Tea Party of being gun and religious clinging racists yet what does he do? He supports people who do far worse and even called the disgusting racist homophobe Trayvon Martin “his son”. 

In terms of race, Obama and his Obamacare and Common Core will segregate healthcare and push people of color and the middle class down the tubes to being slaves of the government.Colleges will have to cut professors, schools with teachers and many new jobs are part-time. What will amnesty for illegal aliens do for the people of color and other immigrants who came here legally and are thrust with the burden of bigotry that will inevitably come their way?Obama is the most racist president ever since President Wilson, FDR, Nixon and LBJ. 

Go read a book. 

October 15, 2013

communismkills:

Someone, be interesting. I’m lonely now thinking about my best friend having transferred, my other best friend in Israel, and my best friend who passed away. ;_;

How’d you like a real libertarian that isn’t stuck on social issues , and loves music, drawing ,writing and reading? 

October 12, 2013

Caine Stands Up

(Source: vimeo.com)

October 10, 2013
new-age-conservative:

personalseries1:

new-age-conservative:

Exactly why are we counting the fall of Constantinople (1453, 2013-560) as the end of the Roman Empire? 

Because it was fall of last remnants of Eastern Roman Empire.

That I know, but they hadn’t been in control of the Colosseum since around 300’s

To be precise, their control waxed and waned throughout the reign of Justinian as he reconquered Italy, a part of Spain and North Africa. The Colosseum itself was used well into the 6th century for contests while the last recorded gladiatorial fights were in the late 5th century. Even though the East did not have control directly, they used the Visigoths as a proxy rulership which steadily almost could have grown into its own Imperial dynasty had it not been for the reconquest. They were popular leaders that maintained the Roman way of life in the early Middle Ages. 
Anyways, after Heraclius, they pretty much said screw it and let go of controlling territories they neither had the money or the means to maintain their conquests. Also considering how their rule was nothing less than horrible did not help the locals, which well preferred the newer status quo of the Visigoths , Franks and whatever “barbarian” kingdoms rooted up over a possible Eastern takeover. While the Eastern Empire was in control of the Colosseum for a century at best, the most control the Empire would ever have would be in Southern Italy , which was consequently the historical area. The area was used by locals to make a church, which just seems ghastly to me. 
Why no one considers the Eastern Empire as Roman or denigrates it only speaks of the flawed logic that spouted of anti-Christians who are too ill to realize that without it, we would not have the Renaissance if not be a backwater altogether, forks, the first modern hospitals and health care, modern law, Greek fire, or the Palaeologean Renaissance in MIstras. Without it, all Westerners would likely all be Muslim and bereft of its dialogue with the Middle East, it would be very much different. Also, Constantinople was very much the New York of the Middle Ages as well as China’s equal in being one of the longest empires running.
But then again, that is without considering the Ottomans or the Russians, who were both descended and married into it, which brings its “end” in the 20th Century with the Osmans and Romanovs. But now I am getting off topic. 

new-age-conservative:

personalseries1:

new-age-conservative:

Exactly why are we counting the fall of Constantinople (1453, 2013-560) as the end of the Roman Empire? 

Because it was fall of last remnants of Eastern Roman Empire.

That I know, but they hadn’t been in control of the Colosseum since around 300’s

To be precise, their control waxed and waned throughout the reign of Justinian as he reconquered Italy, a part of Spain and North Africa. The Colosseum itself was used well into the 6th century for contests while the last recorded gladiatorial fights were in the late 5th century. Even though the East did not have control directly, they used the Visigoths as a proxy rulership which steadily almost could have grown into its own Imperial dynasty had it not been for the reconquest. They were popular leaders that maintained the Roman way of life in the early Middle Ages. 

Anyways, after Heraclius, they pretty much said screw it and let go of controlling territories they neither had the money or the means to maintain their conquests. Also considering how their rule was nothing less than horrible did not help the locals, which well preferred the newer status quo of the Visigoths , Franks and whatever “barbarian” kingdoms rooted up over a possible Eastern takeover. While the Eastern Empire was in control of the Colosseum for a century at best, the most control the Empire would ever have would be in Southern Italy , which was consequently the historical area. The area was used by locals to make a church, which just seems ghastly to me. 

Why no one considers the Eastern Empire as Roman or denigrates it only speaks of the flawed logic that spouted of anti-Christians who are too ill to realize that without it, we would not have the Renaissance if not be a backwater altogether, forks, the first modern hospitals and health care, modern law, Greek fire, or the Palaeologean Renaissance in MIstras. Without it, all Westerners would likely all be Muslim and bereft of its dialogue with the Middle East, it would be very much different. Also, Constantinople was very much the New York of the Middle Ages as well as China’s equal in being one of the longest empires running.

But then again, that is without considering the Ottomans or the Russians, who were both descended and married into it, which brings its “end” in the 20th Century with the Osmans and Romanovs. But now I am getting off topic. 

October 10, 2013
Communism Kills: collegethenlife: The possibility or impossibility of a free market is...

collegethenlife:

The possibility or impossibility of a free market is not a matter of opinion.

My economics teacher is saying that government intervention is needed for an effective market.

I am also being told that a free market always works and any government intervention will cause a…

(Source: collegethenbye)

October 10, 2013
First Amendment used to break Park Service barriers during shutdown

(Source: new-age-conservative)